Julie Bindel
19 posts todayhttps://t.co/b5lWvb...
https://t.co/b5lWvb...
RT @jessesingal: 3/ We're like two weeks from the head of the ACLU denouncing the Skokie thing in a column headlined "We Did A Racism. We Did An Imperialism. We Were Poopoo Heads. But, Big Mood: We Apologize, Y'All"
RT @jessesingal: 2/ I know that if you're in certain media/academic/corp... settings, there's a social and professional cost to acknowledging that there's some serious strangeness afoot, but how can you *not* find this stuff interesting?? It's a very ...
RT @jessesingal: Planned Parenthood taking to The New York Times to express remorse for its focus on "women's health" https://t.co/KmjUsm... https://t.co/H51wVx...
https://t.co/J7S95i...
RT @BarbaraRich_law: @anyabike @MForstater @KathViner @guardian Absolutely right. I complained to the readers’ editor about another case, some years ago, which a Guardian journalist had completely misunderstood and got a very constructive response
RT @anyabike: @MForstater @KathViner @guardian 1: Complain to Reader's Editor (https://t.co/uSq7U... and when that gets you nowhere 2: Complain to external Review Panel (https://t.co/lvRHq...
RT @cathydevine56: @MForstater @KathViner @guardian How does this parent and child combo get a platform for personal opinions? I guess because dad is architecture critic of the Observer. But really, to use this platform to misrepresent Littman and ...
RT @MForstater: Nor does does the judgment say "denied the identities of people with whom she might have to work". Why not quote from the actual judgment? Because that wouldn't work as a device to smear JK Rowling. https://t.co/tnOzcN...
RT @MForstater: The judgment did not say that I did anything aggressively, nor that I was aggressive. So no that was not the "basis of the judgment" it is a smear on my character entirely made up by @guardian in order to discredit me and by extension ...
RT @MForstater: Claim 4: the tribunal’s ruling was that Forstater aggressively denied the identities of people with whom she might have to work Not true https://t.co/j8CmHZ...
RT @MForstater: "in other words..." 🙄 No the article does not discuss trans people's desire to assert their identity or compare it to sexual violence Guardian: if you are going to talk about the article then why not quote from it and link to it? ...
RT @MForstater: 3. The article is not about "transgender people’s use of pronouns" - it is about the social norm that *other people* must comply with the demand to use non sex based pronouns. ...
RT @MForstater: 1. "Strongly endorsed" = I tweeted a link to an article and said it was important 2. This was after I lost my job, so what is it doing in the Guardian narrative *before* I lost my job - are they trying to suggest spurious causality? ...
RT @MForstater: Claim 3: Forstater has strongly endorsed an article ... Lets unpack that... https://t.co/ztrMbo...
RT @MForstater: Claim 2: She repeatedly proclaimed on social media that “it is not possible for someone who is male to become female” Not true https://t.co/E6yy89...
RT @MForstater: Claim 1: She repeatedly proclaimed on social media that “transwomen are men”. Not true. https://t.co/lnoent...
RT @sammywoodhouse1: Tune into BBC Radio Leeds now to hear my Interview about upcoming show SURVIVORS with Denise Welch.
Lucy through the first vote at the Stonewall Riots off https://t.co/beWoJG...